The “natural” label on your food is baloney


So Im at my neighborhood grocery store, doing my shopping for the week. Im kind of a health nut, so I go rightfor the stuff labeled natural. What is carrageenan? Alright, allnatural chicken hearts. Wow, okay. Corn syrup solids? Maltodextrin? Dextrose? Got some natural cheese. Natamycin? What the hell is that? Im not alone in my fluster. There have been more than 100 prosecutions filedsince 2011 over this name, natural. The store Consumer Reports has announced onthe FDA to ban the word. Because, when it comes to food, natural doesntmean what you might think. In one canvas, 60% of Americans considered naturalproducts were free from substances, artificial ingredients and pesticides. But thats not the case at all. At least , not according to the two governmentagencies who regulate our food supply … the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, directs processed foods like cereal, chippings, shredded cheese. Altogether, the FDA regulate 80% of our foodsupply. And according to the FDA, there is no strictdefinition for what forms something natural. Their website was of the view that because most ofwhat we eat bears little resemblance to anything that comes from nature.But this lack of clarity seems to just causeconfusion among consumers. The other government agency at play here isthe U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA. It adjusts eggs, meat and poultry. And their clarity is a little more specific. It mostly says you cant add anythingafter an animal has been slaughtered and call the thing you’ve made natural. The description doesnt tell you anything abouthow the animal was raised, what kind of food it gobble, or whether it was given hormonesor antibiotics. For eggs, the period is completely meaningless. The fact that most of us dont know whatthe natural description does and doesnt … this translates to big bucks for foodcompanies. The indication here shows the sales of organic foodproducts over the past ten years. Theyve pranced from virtually $14 billion in2005 to approximately $40 billion in 2015. If business want to call something organic, regulators have to check to make sure its mainly free of synthetic pesticides, chemicalfertilizers and GMOs. Its an expensive and timeconsuming process. So they use the word natural to tryto tap into a germinating marketplace without the hassle and expense of actually starting organic.But that could be changing. The FDA only wrapped up a public observe periodwhere they asked whether they should create a stricter definition for the term natural. But even if the government characterized the termnatural, it wouldnt mean the same thing as healthy. Lawsuits was suggested that geneticallymodifiedcrops cant be called natural, but spate of proof shows theyre safe toeat. And while some food additives may be dangerous, the majority of members of them are safe, at least according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest. The bigger peril when it is necessary to processedfoods may not be their synthetic supplements, but the naturally occurring ingredients thatget hurled in in surprisingly high-pitched quantities. The CSPI says there are two things that causemore damage than all the food additives mixed: salt.And sugar ..


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here